|

|
Characteristics
of the Surface Tension
of Blygold PoluAl
|
| The
following study was performed by the Technical University
(Hechtingsinstituut) in Delft, Netherlands to determine the
wetting of polar liquids on surfaces coated with Blygold products.
The data indicates that Blygold PoluAl does not have a high
polar content, which means that surfaces coated with Blygold
PoluAl (condenser/evaporator coils) repulse liquids; and therefore,
are resistant to wetting. This characteristic also makes the
surface of the coating resistant to dust/dirt adherence. |
|
Report:
HI 2065
Title:
Contact Angle Measurements Blygold Coatings
Ir.
D.P. Borger
April
2000
|
Summary:
Contact Angle Measurements have been done to estimate the
polarity of coated surfaces.
|
| Substrate: |
5
different coatings |
| Pre-treatment: |
- |
| Adhesive: |
- |
| Keywords: |
Coating,
Contact Angle, Polar contribution, Surface energy |
| |
|
| Opdrachtgever: |
Blygold
International B.V. |
| Projectnummer: |
2000.22 |
| Filelocatie: |
D:\Rapport\2000 |
| Auteur: |
ir.
D.P. Borger |
| Gecontroleerd: |
ir.
A. Kwakernaak |
| Introduction |
| The
surface energy (g) of a solid surface can be divided into
a dispersion (gd) - and a polar (gp) contribution. The dispersion
energy contribution is built up from a single interaction,
which is generated by the movement of electrons around an
atom or molecule. The polar contribution is built up from
different forces/interactions like hydrogen bonds, covalent
bonds and dipole-dipole interactions. The surface energy,
which is defined as the sum of the dispersion and polar contribution
of a solid surface, can be determined by contact angle measurements.
The larger the polar contribution to the surface energy, the
more the surface attracts polar liquids and the higher the
wettability of the surface by water. |
| Problem
Definition |
| At
the firm Blygold Int., coatings are used to protect metal
surfaces from different kinds of external influences. Before
a coating is applied it is important to determine the wetting
of polar liquids, such as water, on the coated surface. |
| Experimental |
| Contact
Angle Measurements are based on the equilibrium between three
phases at the solid interface: |
| ·
Solid phase |
| ·
Liquid phase |
| ·
Vapour phase |
A
drop of fluid on a solid surface will transform itself until
it reaches an equilibrium. At the edge of the drop there are
three different forces/tensions present: gSV, gSL and gLV
(S=Solid, L=Liquid and V=Vapour). This three-phase-equilibrium
can be expressed as:
|
| gSV
- gSL = gLV · cos q |
[1] |
| q
is the contact angle [°]. The surface energy g [N/m] can
be written as: |
|
| g
= gS + gLV - gSL = gLV · (1+cos q) |
[2] |
| To
determine the dispersion- and polar contribution to the surface
energy g, Owens and Wendt have formulated an empirical equation
based on a geometrical average: |
| g
= 2 (( gSd gLd )1/2 + ( gSp gLp )1/2) |
[3] |
By
combining equations 2 and 3, and by measuring the contact
angles of 5 different fluids on the solid surface, the dispersion-
and polar contribution to the surface energy can be determined.
The test fluids selected for the contact angle measurements
are:
Water, Glycerol, Formamide, 1-bromonaphtalene and tricresylphosphate.
The dispersion and polar contribution to the surface tension
of these fluids are known at the liquid-vapour interface.
This means that only gSd and gSp are unknowns in the combination
of equations 2 and 3. |


The
difference in polar contribution to the total surface energy
is, for all coatings, clearly demonstrated by these results.
The results of the measurements of the Blygold Polual coatings
show that these coatings do not have a highly polar component
Especially Blygold Polual has, with a polar component of 3.37
mN/m, a very low polar contribution to the surface energy,
which means that the wettability of this surface by polar
liquids is poor. This non-polar surface will be repulsive
to liquids like water.
This can be seen in the result of the contact angle of water,
which is very high. Due to this property it is also dirt repellent. |
| The
difference in the dispersion contribution of the coatings
can be explained by the difference in density of the coatings.
The higher the density the larger the dispersion contribution
to the surface energy. |

Return
to Test Reports
Click here
|